Table 4 Hypothesis testing for Mobile learning adoption model (direct Effect)
From: Understanding the antecedents of intention for using mobile learning
| Â | Original Sample (O) | T Statistics (|O/STDEV|) | P Values | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
H1a: Epistemic curiosity—>Computer Self-Efficacy | 0.264 | 4.312 | 0 | Supported |
H1b:Epistemic curiosity—>Locus of Control | 0.18 | 2.455 | 0.014 | Supported |
H1c: Epistemic curiosity—>Perceived functional benefit | 0.258 | 4.191 | 0 | Supported |
H1d: Epistemic curiosity—>Perceived learner value | 0.277 | 3.8 | 0 | Supported |
H2a: Security Risk—>Computer Self-Efficacy | 0.254 | 3.4 | 0.001 | Supported |
H2b: Security Risk—>Locus of Control | 0.236 | 3.453 | 0.001 | Supported |
H2c: Security Risk—>Perceived functional benefit | 0.092 | 1.559 | 0.12 | Not supported |
H2d: Security Risk—>Perceived learner value | -0.065 | 0.898 | 0.37 | Not supported |
H3a: Social Influence—>Computer Self-Efficacy | 0.138 | 1.967 | 0.05 | Supported |
H3b: Social Influence—>Locus of Control | 0.291 | 4.442 | 0 | Supported |
H3c: Social Influence—>Perceived functional benefit | 0.271 | 4.728 | 0 | Supported |
H3d: Social Influence—>Perceived learner value | 0.204 | 3.323 | 0.001 | Supported |
H4a: Computer Self-Efficacy—>Perceived functional benefit | 0.091 | 1.394 | 0.164 | Not supported |
H4b: Computer Self-Efficacy—>Perceived learner value | 0.21 | 2.487 | 0.013 | Supported |
H5a: Locus of Control—>Perceived functional benefit | 0.231 | 3.288 | 0.001 | Supported |
H5b: Locus of Control—>Perceived learner value | 0.189 | 2.785 | 0.006 | Supported |
H6: Perceived functional benefit—>Mobile Learning adoption | 0.36 | 4.725 | 0 | Supported |
H7: Perceived learner value—>Mobile Learning adoption | 0.432 | 5.419 | 0 | Supported |