Understanding the antecedents of intention for using mobile learning

Smart Learning Environments

Table 5 Hypothesis testing for Mobile learning adoption model (indirect effect)

	Original sample (O)	T statistics (\|O/STDEV\|)	P Values	Bias	2.50%	97.50%
Epistemic curiosity—>Locus of Control—>Perceived functional benefit	0.042	2.23	0.026	− 0.002	0.013	0.088
Security Risk—>Locus of Control—>Perceived functional benefit	0.055	2.498	0.013	− 0.002	0.026	0.111
Social Influence—>Locus of Control—>Perceived functional benefit	0.067	2.577	0.010	− 0.002	0.03	0.135
Social Influence—>Locus of Control—>Perceived learner value	0.055	2.501	0.013	− 0.002	0.018	0.105
Computer Self-Efficacy—>Perceived learner value—>Mobile Learning adoption	0.091	2.128	0.034	0.003	0.024	0.186
Locus of Control—>Perceived learner value—>Mobile Learning adoption	0.082	2.453	0.015	− 0.002	0.028	0.156
Locus of Control—>Perceived functional benefit—>Mobile Learning adoption	0.083	2.761	0.006	− 0.001	0.039	0.159
Security Risk—>Locus of Control—>Perceived functional benefit—>Mobile Learning adoption	0.02	2.112	0.035	− 0.001	0.008	0.05
Social Influence—>Locus of Control—>Perceived functional benefit—>Mobile Learning adoption	0.024	2.557	0.011	− 0.001	0.011	0.05
Social Influence—>Locus of Control—>Perceived learner value—>Mobile Learning adoption	0.024	2.105	0.036	− 0.001	0.008	0.057