Table 2 UEQ analysis and comparison to benchmark dataset
Scale | Mean | S.D | Cronbach’s alpha | Comparison to benchmark | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attractiveness | 1.61 | 1.15 | 0.96 | Good | 10% of results better, 75% of results worse |
Perspicuity | 1.94 | 0.71 | 0.86 | Good | 10% of results better, 75% of results worse |
Efficiency | 1.46 | 1.08 | 0.79 | Above average | 25% of results better, 50% of results worse |
Dependability | 1.74 | 0.63 | 0.81 | Excellent | In the range of the 10% best results |
Stimulation | 1.97 | 0.68 | 0.81 | Excellent | In the range of the 10% best results |
Novelty | 1.60 | 1.00 | 0.92 | Good | 10% of results better, 75% of results worse |