Table 1 Quality criteria
From: Revealing the true potential and prospects of augmented reality in education
# | Assessment question | Weight |
|---|---|---|
C1 | Is the paper published in a recognized source? | Conferences/Workshops: CORE A* or A (+ 1.5), CORE B (+ 1), CORE C (+ 0.5), not included in CORE ranking (+ 0) Journals: ranked Q1 (+ 2), ranked Q2 (+ 1.5), ranked Q3 or Q4 (+ 1), no JCR ranking (+ 0) |
C2 | Is the technological solution presented in details? | Yes (+ 1), Partially (+ 0.5), No (+ 0) |
C3 | Is there any evaluation/assessment method? | Yes (+ 1) / No (+ 0) |
C4 | What is the number of subjects in the assessment phase? |  ≥ 101 (+ 6), 81–100 (+ 5), 61–80 (+ 4), 41–60 (+ 3), 21–40 (+ 2), 1–20 (+ 1), 0 or not specified (+ 0) |