Table 6 The students’ feedback regarding EDINAR
From: Designing and evaluating an augmented reality system for an engineering drawing course
| Â | Comments | Responses (in %) |
|---|---|---|
Usefulness of AR | Find AR useful | 95.40 |
|  | Didn’t find AR useful | 0.04 |
Positive factors of EDINAR | AR has transformed the way we study ED | 15.81 |
| Â | This application is a good substitute for AutoCAD | 18.36 |
| Â | AR has assisted in the visualization of complicated concepts in the ED | 28.57 |
| Â | In addition to video games, education is another potential application of augmented reality | 6.63 |
Negative factors of EDINAR | None | 82.14 |
|  | There were challenges with the app’s functionalities | 8.16 |
|  | The application’s UI interface was not good | 3.06 |
| Â | Some ED topics, such as cross-section, were inadequate. As explained in the application | 6.63 |
What EDINAR provides | Helpful for first-year students taking an ED class | 46.93 |
| Â | Could be used in the classroom by teachers to teach ED | 24.48 |
| Â | This application would benefit undergraduates in the Civil and Mechanical Engineering departments | 28.57 |
Recommendation to use EDINAR | Yes | 98.97 |
| Â | No | Â |