From: Tools and evaluation methods for discussion and presentation skills training
Criteria | Bad | Poor | Fair | Good | Excellent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content | |||||
Clarity of Content | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Quality of Content | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Is it complete with sufficient background, methodology, and results? | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Supports main points | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Organization | |||||
Layout | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Is it logically organized into sections with text and graphics that flow from one part to the next? | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Appropriate font size | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Is it readable? | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Important information is readily available and easy to grasp | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Clearly identified topic and purpose | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Does it emphasize the most important components of the research? | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Informative and clear | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Well-chosen graphics and use of color to emphasize key points | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Impact | |||||
Did it catch your interest? | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |