Table 6 Confusion matrix of the best perform models
From: Developing an early-warning system for spotting at-risk students by using eBook interaction logs
Raw Data - RF | Categorical Data - NB | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week | Class | HP | LP | Total | HP | LP | Total |
W3 | HP | 40.0% | 10.9% | 50.9% | 36.0% | 8.4% | 44.4% |
LP | 10.0% | 39.1% | 49.1% | 14.0% | 41.6% | 55.6% | |
Total | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
W6 | HP | 39.9% | 9.6% | 49.5% | 33.2% | 2.3% | 35.5% |
LP | 10.1% | 40.4% | 50.5% | 16.8% | 47.7% | 64.5% | |
Total | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
W15 | HP | 43.9% | 7.9% | 51.8% | 38.3% | 5.8% | 44.1% |
LP | 8.1% | 42.1% | 50.2% | 11.7% | 44.2% | 55.9% | |
Total | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |