Skip to main content

Table 2 Significance between Pre-Test Variable (2.3) and Post-Test Variable (4.1 to 4.4)

From: Effectiveness of peer review as cooperative web-based learning method applied out-of-class in a role playing game: A case study by quasi-experimental approach

 

Criterion

Experimental Group

Significance

Pre-Test (Var. 2.3)

Post-Test (Var.4)

(4) Group Dynamics (1 = no....6 = yes)

(4.1) I learned from my colleagues

4.90 (2.33)

5.06 (2.32)

t(60) = −1.16; p = .251 (n.s)

(4.2) We will all perform with better scores

5.61 (2.49)

t(60) = −.27; p = .786 (n.s)

(4.3) We have achieved something together

7.23 (1.78)

t(56) = −4.41; p = .001 (s.)

(4.4) I would like to continue working together

5.77 (2.39)

t(60) = −1.45; p = .151 (n.s.)

  1. (n.)s. = (not) significant for p ≤ .05; values are means, numbers in brackets indicate standard deviation