Table 3 Survey results
From: Flipped learning wheel (FLW): a framework and process design for flipped L2 writing classes
No. | Survey question | Participant | Result | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ | Mean | SD | ||
1 | Revision based on feedback (either teacher feedback or peer feedback) is important for the improvement of writing skills. | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4.75 | 0.463 |
2 | In L2 writing, teachers do not provide immediate feedback on students’ writing works. | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3.88 | 0.641 |
3 | In L2 writing, teachers do not provide sufficient feedback on students’ writing works. | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3.63 | 0.916 |
4 | Peer feedback is beneficial for students with high language proficiency. | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3.75 | 1.035 |
5 | Peer feedback is beneficial for students with low language proficiency. | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3.50 | 1.195 |
6 | Peer feedback is beneficial for feedback givers. | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4.38 | 0.518 |
7 | Peer feedback is beneficial for feedback receivers. | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.25 | 0.463 |