Skip to main content

Table 4 Multiple regression models for the relationships between the creativity subscales, self-efficacy and career motivation

From: The colours of the Higgs boson: a study in creativity and science motivation among high-school students in Italy

 

β

B

SE

95% CI

p value

Model 1: SE as dependent variable

Age

− 0.12

− 0.15

0.10

− 0.32, 0.02

0.077

Gender (female)

− 0.18

− 0.32

0.13

− .055, − 0.09

0.006

CACT

0.38

0.63

0.13

0.37, 0.89

 < 0.001

CFLOW

0.13

0.18

0.11

− .034, 0.40

0.098

R2adj = 0.27, F = 17.29, p < .001

     

Model 2: CM as dependent variable

Age

− 0.01

− 0.01

0.07

− 0.14, 0.14

0.980

Gender (female)

0.03

0.05

0.10

− 0.14, 0.24

0.610

CACT

0.18

0.31

0.12

0.09, 0.54

0.007

CFLOW

− 0.01

− 0.01

0.09

− 0.18, 0.17

0.969

SE

0.66

0.70

0.06

0.57, 0.82

 < 0.001

R2adj = 0.56, F = 45.52, p < .001

     
  1. N = 175. B = unstandardised coefficient; β = standardised coefficient; SE = standard error; CI = confidence interval; R2adj = adjusted R2. CACT = creativity subscale act; CFLOW = creativity subscale flow; CM = career motivation; SE = self-efficacy