From: Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study
Themes and Sub-themes | Codes | References |
---|---|---|
1. Content 1.1 Positive | Generation of more ideas on the topic | 22 |
Focused information on the topic | 21 | |
Promotion of learner autonomy | 19 | |
Promotion of collaboration | 15 | |
Faster writing speed | 13 | |
Creation of strong topic sentences | 13 | |
Time-saving in brainstorming | 8 | |
1.2 Negative | Less motivation to think | 4 |
More machine dependence | 3 | |
2. Organization 2.1 Positive and specific | Easy to stay focused | 22 |
Strong connection between the main idea and the supporting details | 17 | |
Appropriate use of signposts | 11 | |
Reaffirming the main idea in the conclusion | 8 | |
Enabling collaborative organization | 7 | |
2.2 Negative | Imposing a pattern on writing | 2 |
Hindering creative organization | 2 | |
3. Grammar 3.1 Positive and specific | Improving accuracy in the sentence structure | 22 |
Reliable source of grammar | 21 | |
Providing explanations for language errors | 17 | |
Making vocabulary choices more accurate | 9 | |
Leading to discussions among peers | 8 | |
Promotion of explicit knowledge of grammar | 7 | |
3.2 Negative | Reduction in attention to grammatical accuracy | 5 |
Increase in machine-dependence | 3 |