Ahumada-Newhart, V., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). A theoretical and qualitative approach to evaluating children’s robot-mediated levels of presence. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000007.
Ahumada-Newhart, V., & Olson, J. S. (2019). Going to school on a robot: Robot and user interface design features that matter. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 26(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325210.
Article
Google Scholar
Alimisis, D., & Kynigos, C. (2009). Constructionism and robotics in education. In D. Alimisis (Ed.), Teacher education on robotics-enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods (pp. 11–26). ASPETE.
Google Scholar
Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223
Article
Google Scholar
Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782481
Article
Google Scholar
Bell, J. (2017). Telepresence robots give distance students their own seat at the table. https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2017/03/telepresence-robots-give-distance-students-their-own-seat-table
Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
Article
Google Scholar
Boaretto, A., & Volungevičienė, A. (2013). Student guide on VMCOLAB Consortium. http://vmcolab.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/studentsGuideA5_v06_FINAL.pdf
Bunt-Kokhuis, S. G. (2001). Academic pilgrims: Faculty mobility in the virtual world. On the Horizon, 9(1), 1–6.
Cha, E., Chen, S., & Mataric, M. J. (2017). Designing telepresence robots for K-12 education. In 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 683–688). IEEE.
Chalmers, C. (2013, March). Learning with FIRST LEGO League. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE) Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Conti, D., Cirasa, C., di Nuovo, S., & di Nuovo, A. (2020). Robot, tell me a tale! A social robot as tool for teachers in Kindergarten. Interaction Studies, 21, 221–243.
Google Scholar
Conti, D., di Nuovo, S., Buono, S., & di Nuovo, A. (2017). Robots in education and care of children with developmental disabilities: A study on acceptance by experienced and future professionals. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9, 51–62.
Article
Google Scholar
Corsby, C. L. T., & Bryant, A. (2020). I felt like I was missing out on something: An evaluation of using remote technology in the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4897–4914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10207-2
Article
Google Scholar
Creelman, A., & Löwe, C. (2019). Mainstreaming virtual mobility—Helping teachers to get onboard. In A. Turula, M. Kurek, & T. Lewis (Eds.), Telecollaboration and virtual exchange across disciplines: In service of social inclusion and global citizenship (pp. 15–22). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.35.935
Chapter
Google Scholar
Daruwalla, Z. J., Collins, D. R., & Moore, D. P. (2010). Orthobot, to your station!" The application of the remote presence robotic system in orthopaedic surgery in Ireland: A pilot study on patient and nursing staff satisfaction. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 4(3), 177–182.
Article
Google Scholar
De Wit, H. (2002). Internationalization of higher education in the USA and Europe: A historical, comparative, and conceptual analysis. Greenwood Press.
Google Scholar
El Said, G. R. (2021). How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect higher education learning experience? An empirical investigation of learners‘ academic performance at a university in a developing country. Advances in Human–computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6649524
Article
Google Scholar
Ensign, T. I. (2017). Elementary educators' attitudes about the utility of educational robotics and their ability and intent to use it with students. Graduate theses, dissertations, and problem reports. 5546. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/5546
Fitter, N. T., Raghunath, N., Cha, E., Sanchez, C. A., Takayama, L., & Matarić, M. J. (2020). Are we there yet? Comparing remote learning technologies in the university classroom. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(2), 2706–2713.
Article
Google Scholar
Gleason, B., & Greenhow, C. (2017). Hybrid learning in higher education: The potential of teaching and learning with robot-mediated communication. Online Learning, 21(4), 159–176.
Article
Google Scholar
Gonnot, A., Michel, C., Marty, J.-C., & Cordier, A. (2019). Social robots in collaborative learning: Consequences of the design on students’ perception. In 11th International conference on computer supported education, May 2019, Heraklion, Greece. ffhal-02112520ff. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02112520
Gura, M. (2012). Lego robotics: STEM sport of the mind. Learning and Leading with Technology, 40(1), 12–16. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ991224
Han, J. (2012). Emerging technologies: Robot assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 1–9. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2012/emerging.pdf
Henderson, N. (1991). The art of moderating: A blend of basic skills and qualities. Quirks Marketing Research Review. http://www.quirks.com/articles/al991/19911209.aspx?searchID=83327&sort=5&pg=l
Karypi, S. (2018). Educational robotics application in primary and secondary education. A challenge for the Greek teacher’s society. Journal of Contemporary Education, Theory & Research, 2(1), 9–14. de:0111-pedocs-190946. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-190946
Kennedy, J. (2016). Colleges are bringing telepresence robots into the classroom to better engage distance learning students and keep traditional lectures lively, TechDecisions, 20–21. https://mytechdecisions.com/unified-communications/why-telepresence-robots-are-polpular-in-higher-education-how-to-use-one-in/
Khanlari, A. (2014). Teachers' perceptions of using robotics in primary/elementary schools in Newfoundland and Labrador. Masters thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland. https://research.library.mun.ca/8068/
Knight, J. (2008). Higher education in turmoil: The changing world of internationalization. Sense Publishers.
Book
Google Scholar
Knight, J. (2012). Concepts, rationales, and interpretive frameworks in the internationalization of higher education. In D. Deardorff, H. de Wit, J. Heyl, & T. Adams (Eds.), The Sage handbook of international higher education (pp. 27–42). Sage Publication.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Knight, J. (2016). Meaning, rationales and tensions in the internationalization of higher education. In S. McGrath & Q. Gu (Eds.), Routledge handbook of international education and development (pp. 325–339). Routledge.
Google Scholar
Kory, J. M., Jeong, S., & Breazeal, C. L. (2013). Robotic learning companions for early language development. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM on international conference on multimodal interaction (pp. 71–72). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2522848.2531750
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 8–22.
Google Scholar
Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., & Loutfi, A. (2013). A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 201(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/902316
Article
Google Scholar
Kwon, O. H., Koo, S. Y., Kim, Y. G., & Kwon, D. S. (2010, October). Telepresence robot system for English tutoring. In 2010 IEEE workshop on advanced robotics and its social impacts (pp. 152–155). IEEE.
Liao, J., & Lu, X. (2018). Exploring the affordances of telepresence robots in foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 20–32. https://doi.org/10125/44652.
Lister, T. (2020). Meaningful engagement via robotic telepresence: An exploratory case study. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 6(1). https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol6/iss1/6
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Google Scholar
Minsky, M. (1980). Telepresence. Omni Magazine, 2(9), 45–51. https://philpapers.org/rec/MINT
Newhart, V. A., Warschauer, M., & Sender, L. (2016). Virtual Inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: An exploratory case study. The International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 23(4), 9–25. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9zm4h7nf
Ogawa, K., Nishio, S., Koda, K., Taura, K., Minato, T., Ishii, C. T., & Ishiguro, H. (2011). Telenoid: Tele-presence android for communication. In ACMSIGGRAPH 2011 emerging technologies on SIGGRAPH ’11 (p. 1). ACM Press.
O’Mahony, J. (2014). Enhancing student learning and teacher development in transnational education. The Higher Education Academy.
Google Scholar
Paulos, E., & Canny, J. (1998). Prop: Personal roving presence. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, January 1998 (pp. 296–303). https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274686
Petre, M., & Price, B. A. (2004). Using robotics to motivate back door learning. Education and Information Technologies, 9(2), 147–158.
Article
Google Scholar
Ponce, P., Molina, A., Caudana, E. O. L., Reyes, G. B., & Parra, N. M. (2019). Improving education in developing countries using robotic platforms. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13, 1401–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00576-5
Article
Google Scholar
Reis, A., Martins, M., Martins, P., Sousa, J., & Barroso, J. (2019). Telepresence robots in the classroom: The state-of-the-art and a proposal for a telepresence service for higher education. In International conference on technology and innovation in learning, teaching and education (pp. 539–550). Springer.
Roberts, J., & Arnold, D. (2012). Robots, the internet and teaching history in the age of the NBN and the Australian curriculum. Teaching History, 46(4), 32–34. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/83477/
Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Koren, Y., & Gordon, G. (2020). Robot-supported collaborative learning (RSCL): Social robots as teaching assistants for higher education small group facilitation. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 6, 148. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00148
Article
Google Scholar
Rubenstein, M., Cimino, B., Nagpal, R., & Werfel, J. (2015). AERobot: An affordable one-robot-per-student system for early robotics education. In IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) (pp. 6107–6113). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2015.7140056
Tanaka, F., Takahashi, T., Matsuzoe, S., Tazawa, N., & Morita, M. (2014). Telepresence robot helps children in communicating with teachers who speak a different language. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction—HRI ’14 (pp. 399–406). ACM Press.
Theodoropoulos, A., Antoniou, A., & Lepouras, G. (2017). Teacher and student views on educational robotics: The Pan-Hellenic competition case. Application and Theory of Computer Technology, 2(4), 1–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Tsui, K. M., Desai, M., Yanco, H. A., & Uhlik, C. (2011). Exploring use cases for telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human–robot Interaction—HRI 11. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957664
Van de Wende, M. (1997). Missing links: the relationship between national policies for internationalization and those for higher education in general. In T. Kalvermanrk & M. Van der Wende (Eds.), National policies for the internationalization of higher education in Europe. Stockholm: Hogskoleverket Studies, National Agency for Higher Education. https://www.uka.se/download/18.12f25798156a345894e2d4a/1487841932292/9708S.pdf
Google Scholar
Yatagiri, V. S. K. (2020). The ideal telepresence robot for education: Configuration and tools. Master of Science, Graduate School, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville.
Yousif, J. (2021). Social and telepresence robots a future of teaching. Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Development Journal, 1(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.52098/airdj.202124
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Duan, P., Zhang, Z., & Esche, S. (2018). Development of telepresence teaching robots with social capabilities (Vol. 52064, p. V005T007A017). https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-86686