Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok- Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.
Article
Google Scholar
Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A. M., & Ellis, R. A. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239–1258.
Article
Google Scholar
Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: Evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093.
Article
Google Scholar
Ahmad, A., et al. (2014). Inquiry-based learning for the arts, humanities, and social sciences: A conceptual and practical resource for educators. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120142.
Article
Google Scholar
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18.
Article
Google Scholar
Al Mamun, M. A. (2018). The role of scaffolding in the instructional design of online, self-directed, inquiry-based learning environments: student engagement and learning approaches. PhD Thesis, The University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2018.607.
Book
Google Scholar
Al Mamun, M. A. (2022). Fostering self-regulation and engaged exploration during the learner-content interaction process: the role of scaffolding in the online inquiry-based learning environment. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 19(4), 482–509. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2021-0195.
Article
Google Scholar
Al Mamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education, 144, 103695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695.
Article
Google Scholar
Al Mamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2022). Exploration of learner-content interactions and learning approaches: The role of guided inquiry in the self-directed online environments. Computers & Education, 178, 104398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104398.
Article
Google Scholar
Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. AU Press.
Google Scholar
Arbaugh, J. B. B. (2014). System, scholar or students? Which most influences online MBA course effectiveness? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12048.
Article
Google Scholar
Archer-Kuhn, B. (2020). Putting social justice in social work education with inquiry-based learning. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 40(5), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2020.1821864.
Article
Google Scholar
Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2013). Investigating the effectiveness of predict-observe- explain strategy on teaching photo electricity topic. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 548–564.
Article
Google Scholar
Baragash, R. S., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Blended learning: Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 2082–2098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.010.
Article
Google Scholar
Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 175–191.
Article
Google Scholar
Becker, S., Klein, P., Gößling, A., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes. Learning and Instruction, 69, 101350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101350.
Article
Google Scholar
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844.
Article
Google Scholar
Bhadani, K., Stöhr, C., Hulthén, E., Quist, J., Bengtsson, M., Evertsson, M., & Malmqvist, J. (2017). Student perspectives on video-based learning in CDIO-based project courses. In The 13th International CDIO Conference Proceedings, Calgary, Canada (pp. 689–704). https://research.chalmers.se/publication/250948.
Bilen, K., Özel, M., & Köse, S. (2016). Using action research based on the predict-observe-explain strategy for teaching enzymes. Turkish Journal of EducationTURJE, 5(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.70576.
Article
Google Scholar
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8.
Article
Google Scholar
Bower, K. M. (2003). When to use Fisher’s Exact Test. American Society for Quality, 2(4), 35–37.
Google Scholar
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Article
Google Scholar
Brenner, D. G., Matlen, B. J., Timms, M. J., Gochyyev, P., Grillo-Hill, A., Luttgen, K., & Varfolomeeva, M. (2017). Modeling student learning behavior patterns in an online science inquiry environment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 405–425.
Article
Google Scholar
Chan, J. W. W., & Pow, J. W. C. (2020). The role of social annotation in facilitating collaborative inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 147, 103787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103787.
Article
Google Scholar
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
Article
Google Scholar
Chen, P.-Y., & Hwang, G.-J. (2019). An IRS-facilitated collective issue-quest approach to enhancing students’ learning achievement, self-regulation and collective efficacy inflipped classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1996–2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12690.
Article
Google Scholar
Cheng, K.-H.H., & Tsai, C.-C.C. (2011). An investigation of Taiwan University students’ perceptions of online academic help seeking, and their web-based learning self-efficacy. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 150–157.
Article
Google Scholar
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman-Young, S., Spanjer, D. M., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1099–1105). National Association of School Psychologists.
Google Scholar
Clark, R., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American Educator, 36(1), 6–11.
Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. (1952). The χ2 test of goodness of fit. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23(3), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729380.
Article
Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024–1037.
Article
Google Scholar
Dev, P. C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: What does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher? Remedial and Special Education, 18(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259701800104.
Article
Google Scholar
Ding, L., Kim, C. M., & Orey, M. (2017). Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers and Education, 115, 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.016.
Article
Google Scholar
Dixson, M. D., Greenwell, M. R., Rogers-Stacy, C., Weister, T., & Lauer, S. (2017). Nonverbal immediacy behaviors and online student engagement: Bringing past instructional research into the present virtual classroom. Communication Education, 66(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1209222.
Article
Google Scholar
Dyer, T., Aroz, J., & Larson, E. (2018). Proximity in the online classroom: engagement, relationships, and personalization. Journal of Instructional Research, 7(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2018.10.
Article
Google Scholar
Fisher, K. (2010). Online student engagement: CCSSE finds enrollment status and online experience are key. Community College Week, 22(20), 7–9.
Google Scholar
Franke, T. M., Ho, T., & Christie, C. A. (2012). The Chi-square test: Often used and more often misinterpreted. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011426594.
Article
Google Scholar
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
Article
Google Scholar
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., Schall Linn, J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009.
Article
Google Scholar
Fryer, L. K., & Bovee, H. N. (2016). Supporting students’ motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.003.
Article
Google Scholar
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903.
Article
Google Scholar
Gromada, A., & Shewbridge, C. (2016). Student learning time. OECD Education Working Papers, August (pp. 1–66). https://doi.org/10.1787/5JM409KQQKJH-EN.
Harris, L. R. (2008). A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03216875.
Article
Google Scholar
Hong, J. C., Hsiao, H. S., Chen, P. H., Lu, C. C., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2021). Critical attitude and ability associated with students’ self-confidence and attitude toward “predict-observe-explain” online science inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 166, 104172.
Article
Google Scholar
Hong, J. C., Tsai, C. R., Hsiao, H. S., Chen, P. H., Chu, K. C., Gu, J., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2019). The effect of the “Prediction-observation-quiz-explanation” inquiry-based e-learning model on flow experience in green energy learning. Computers and Education, 133, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.009.
Article
Google Scholar
Horne, M., Woodhead, K., Morgan, L., Smithies, L., Megson, D., & Lyte, G. (2007). Using enquiry in learning: From vision to reality in higher education. Nurse Education Today, 27(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.03.004.
Article
Google Scholar
Hughes, C., Costley, J., & Lange, C. (2019). The effects of multimedia video lectures on extraneous load. Distance Education, 40(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553559.
Article
Google Scholar
Karamustafaoğlu, S., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2015). Understanding electrochemistry concepts using the predict-observe-explain strategy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 923–936.
Article
Google Scholar
Kehrwald, B. A., & Bentley, B. P. (2020). Understanding and identifying cognitive load in networked learning. In N. B. Dohn, P. Jandrić, T. Ryberg, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Mobility, data and learner agency in networked learning, research in networked learning (pp. 103–115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36911-8_7.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Kim, T., & Park, J. (2019). More about the basic assumptions of t-test: normality and sample size. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(4), 331–335. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.d.18.00292.
Article
Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Clark, R., Kirchener, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102.
Article
Google Scholar
Kirwan, A., & Adams, J. (2009). Students’ views of enquiry-based learning in a continuing professional development module. Nurse Education Today, 29(4), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.09.003.
Article
Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2013). Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). In Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2 ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14136-000.
Kopeinik, S., Lex, E., Seitlinger, P., Albert, D., & Ley, T. (2017). Supporting collaborative learning with tag recommendations. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference (pp. 409–418). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027421.
Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Hennis, T., de Vries, P., Hatala, M., Dawson, S., Siemens, G., & Gašević, D. (2019). Examining communities of inquiry in Massive Open Online Courses: The role of study strategies. Internet and Higher Education, 40(2019), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.001.
Article
Google Scholar
Kubicek, J. (2005). Inquiry-based learning, the nature of science, and computer technology: New possibilities in science education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(1), 1–13.
Google Scholar
Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021). Strategies for enhancing self-regulation in e-learning: a review ofselected journal publications from 2010 to 2020. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1943455.
Article
Google Scholar
Lai, C.-L., Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-H. (2018). The effects of computer-supported self-regulation inscience inquiry on learning outcomes, learning processes, and self-efficacy. EducationalTechnology Research and Development, 66(4), 863–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9585-y.
Article
Google Scholar
Laursen, S. L., Hassi, M.-L., Kogan, M., Hunter, A.-B., & Weston, T. J. (2011). Evaluation of the IBL mathematics project: Student and instructor outcomes of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics. https://www.colorado.edu/eer/sites/default/files/attached-files/iblmathreportall_050211.pdf.
Laursen, S. L., Hassi, M.-L., Kogan, M., & Weston, T. J. (2014). Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics: A multi-institution study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0406.
Article
Google Scholar
Lazonder, A. W. (2014). Inquiry learning. In M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 453–464). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_36.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Lee, H. S., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., & Liu, O. L. (2010). How do technology-enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20304.
Article
Google Scholar
Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability (switzerland), 11(4), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985.
Article
Google Scholar
Lei, M., Clemente, I. M., & Hu, Y. (2019). Student in the shell: The robotic body and student engagement. Computers and Education, 130, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.008.
Article
Google Scholar
Levett-Jones, T., Hoffman, K., Dempsey, J., Jeong, S.Y.-S., Noble, D., Norton, C. A., Roche, J., & Hickey, N. (2010). The ‘five rights’ of clinical reasoning: An educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically ‘at risk’ patients. Nurse Education Today, 30(6), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.020.
Article
Google Scholar
Lewis, C., Wolff, K., & Bekker, B. (2021). Supporting project-based education through a community of practice: A case of postgraduate renewable energy students. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 19(1), 35–40.
Google Scholar
Li, H., Gobert, J., & Dickler, R. (2019). Testing the robustness of inquiry practices once scaffolding is removed. In Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 11528 LNCS (pp. 204–213). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22244-4_25.
Luo, T. (2015). Instructional guidance in microblogging-supported learning: Insights from a multiple case study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9097-2.
Article
Google Scholar
MacDonald, P. L., & Gardner, R. C. (2000). Type I error rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for I × J chi-square tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970871.
Article
Google Scholar
MacKinnon, S. L. (2017). "The Curiosity Project”: Re-igniting the desire to inquire and transformation through intrinsically-motivated learning and mentorship. Journal of Transformative Learning, 4(1), 4–21.
Google Scholar
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153.
Article
Google Scholar
Mason, R. B. (2011). Student engagement with, and participation in, an e-Forum. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 258–268.
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14.
Article
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197.
Article
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3482.
Article
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187.
Article
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.
Article
Google Scholar
McHugh, M. L. (2012). The Chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018.
Article
Google Scholar
Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student engagement in online learning: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.20018.
Article
Google Scholar
Miles, D., Mensinga, J., & Zuchowski, I. (2018). Harnessing opportunities to enhance the distance learning experience of MSW students: An appreciative inquiry process. Social Work Education, 37(6), 705–717.
Article
Google Scholar
Molecular Workbench. (n.d.). Next-generation molecular workbench. Visual, interactive simulations for teaching & learning science (Vol. 2014). The Concord Consortium. http://mw.concord.org/nextgen/.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659.
Article
Google Scholar
Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.001.
Article
Google Scholar
Mount, N. J., Chambers, C., Weaver, D., & Priestnall, G. (2009). Learner immersion engagement in the 3D virtual world: Principles emerging from the DELVE project. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 8(3), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2009.08030040.
Article
Google Scholar
O’Brien, J. (1993). Action research through stimulated recall. Research in Science Education, 23(1), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357063.
Article
Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(5), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500402447.
Article
Google Scholar
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Pallant, A., & Tinker, R. F. (2004). Reasoning with atomic-scale molecular dynamic models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000019638.01800.d0.
Article
Google Scholar
Parker, A. (2003). Identifying predictors of academic persistence in distance education. United States Distance Learning Assocication Journal, 17(1), 55–62.
Google Scholar
Payne, L. (2019). Student engagement: Three models for its investigation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(5), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1391186.
Article
Google Scholar
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003.
Article
Google Scholar
PhET. (n.d.). States of matter: Basics. In PhET interactive simulations. University of Colorado. https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/states-of-matter-basics.
Podolefsky, N. S., Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2009). Student choices when learning with computer simulations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1179(2009), 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266722.
Article
Google Scholar
Poncet, A., Courvoisier, D. S., Combescure, C., & Perneger, T. V. (2016). Normality and sample size do not matter for the selection of an appropriate statistical test for two-group comparisons. Methodology, 12(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000110.
Article
Google Scholar
Raspopovic, M., Jankulovic, A., Runic, J., & Lucic, V. (2014). Success factors for e-Learning in a developing country: A case study of Serbia. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1586.
Article
Google Scholar
Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H.-R. (2019). A teacher-focused intervention to enhance students’ classroom engagement. In Handbook of student engagement interventions (pp. 87–102). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813413-9.00007-3.
Rodríguez, G., Pérez, N., Núñez, G., Baños, J. E., & Carrió, M. (2019). Developing creative and research skills through an open and interprofessional inquiry-based learning course. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12909-019-1563-5.
Article
Google Scholar
Rojas, D., Kapralos, B., & Dubrowski, A. (2016). The role of game elements in online learning within health professions education. In Studies in health technology and informatics (Vol. 220, pp. 329–334). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-625-5-329.
Romero, M., & Barberà, E. (2011). Quality of learners’ time and learning performance beyond quantitative time-on-task. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(5), 125–137.
Article
Google Scholar
Romero, M., & Lambropoulos, N. (2011). Internal and external regulation to support knowledge construction and convergence in computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 9(1), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v9i23.1439.
Article
Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Article
Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
Article
Google Scholar
Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2009). Interviewing in qualitative research: The one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation, 16(6), 309–314.
Article
Google Scholar
Samsudin, A., & Efendi, R. (2019). Teaching solar system topic through Predict-Observe-Explain-Apply (POEA) strategy: A path to students’ conceptual change. Journal of Education and Teacher Training, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i1.3658.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. A., Rosenberg, J. M., & Beymer, P. N. (2018). A person-in-context approach to student engagement in science: Examining learning activities and choice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 19–43.
Article
Google Scholar
Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Gillet, D., Pelliccione, L., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using educational data from teaching and learning to inform teachers’ reflective educational design in inquiry-based STEM education. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.014.
Article
Google Scholar
Sharpe, D. (2015). Chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation Practical Assessment. https://doi.org/10.7275/tbfa-x148.
Article
Google Scholar
Sharples, M., Scanlon, E., Ainsworth, S., Anastopoulou, S., Collins, T., Crook, C., Jones, A., Kerawalla, L., Littleton, K., Mulholland, P., & O’malley, C. (2015). Personal inquiry: Orchestrating science investigations within and beyond the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(2), 308–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.944642.
Article
Google Scholar
Sheeran, N., & Cummings, D. J. (2018). An examination of the relationship between Facebook groups attached to university courses and student engagement. Higher Education, 76, 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0253-2.
Article
Google Scholar
Shen, W. (2014). Using video recording system to improve student performance in high-fidelity simulation. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering LNEE, 269, 1753–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_203.
Article
Google Scholar
Shih, J. L., Chuang, C. W., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). An inquiry-based mobile learning approach to enhancing social science learning effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 50–62.
Google Scholar
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924.
Article
Google Scholar
Sotiriou, S. A., Lazoudis, A., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Inquiry-based learning and E-learning: How to serve high and low achievers. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00130-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Spronken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903315502.
Article
Google Scholar
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
Article
Google Scholar
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. ACER Press.
Google Scholar
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.
Article
Google Scholar
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135.
Article
Google Scholar
Tang, L.-C., & Sung, H.-C. (2012). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on nursing studentsʼ critical thinking: A systematic review. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 10(57), 3907–3916. https://doi.org/10.11124/01938924-201210570-00005.
Article
Google Scholar
Theobald, K. A., & Ramsbotham, J. (2019). Inquiry-based learning and clinical reasoning scaffolds: An action research project to support undergraduate students’ learning to ‘think like a nurse.’ Nurse Education in Practice, 38, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.05.018.
Article
Google Scholar
van der Graaf, J., Segers, E., & de Jong, T. (2020). Fostering integration of informational texts and virtual labs during inquiry-based learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101890.
Article
Google Scholar
Vytasek, J. M., Patzak, A., & Winne, P. H. (2020). Analytics for student engagement. In M. Virvou, E. Alepis, G. Tsihrintzis, & L. Jain (Eds.), Machine learning paradigms intelligent systems reference library (Vol. 158, pp. 23–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13743-4_3.
Chapter
Google Scholar
White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. The Falmer Press.
Google Scholar
Xiao, J. (2017). Learner-content interaction in distance education: The weakest link in interaction research. Distance Education, 38(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1298982.
Article
Google Scholar
Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001). Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 25(3), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250922.
Article
Google Scholar
Young, M. R. (2010). The art and science of fostering engaged learning. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(S1), 1–18.
Google Scholar